![]() ![]() In this domain, too, there are some amazing innovations but it should be noted that we are in the midst of it with no definite winner (or end goal) in sight. Note taking: Please don’t do it in Word.I will only list a few of them: MarginNote, LiquidText, and Flexcil (check out PaperlessX YT channel). There are some amazing new innovations in this regard. Reading: Since by now you will have collected most of your material digitally, you need a digital reader to go with it.This greatly helps in managing your project, keeping track of what you have found and what you have read. Also invest in a bibliography manager, like Zotero. Over time, of course, you will curate a list of preferred websites (if only in your head). ![]() ![]() The same techniques they share in this domain can be applied to our own needs. SCRIVENER VS NISUS WRITER PRO HOW TOHow to get, for example, a digitized version of the first edition of a certain book? It could be interesting to get familiar with OSINT: open source intelligence. But knowing how to find things in the digital world is a different game. Finding: You know how to find new stuff through footnotes, bibliographies, catalogs, and so forth.Perhaps even go so far as to convert files into your preferred file format, to ensure long-term storage. Also notice how you may prefer certain file formats over others, such as. Think of a backup strategy, like Zenodo for publications, Dropbox for personal files, and a local backup for your entire computer. Publishing: think of a good filing system into folders and file names, slice up everything you have into categories of importance, with the most important stuff directly on your computer but with the option of storing less important stuff on external hard drives.And Microsoft Word is barely the right choice for the writing phase, let alone the other ones. Now the thing is: each phase can benefit from digital tools. Of course there is overlap between the stages, but generally they can be distinguished in this order. Once you’ve collected enough notes, writing is upon you, to bring it all together into a publication, completing the circle. This leads to notes, both while reading and afterwards (notes of notes). By then, it’s time to read (or examine or interview) them. That is the finding phase, which also includes the first stage of a project in which you collect your materials. This unresolved question needs to be sharpened, tested and fully worked out into subquestions and project descriptions. By finishing one thing, you start to think of new things to do (by things I mean of course: things that would benefit not just your curiosity but the advancement of the state of the art in your field). In any case, for a good academic (like yourself) your publications invariably lead to new questions, ideas, or avenues. I include official ones, like books and articles, as well as unofficial ones, like grant proposals. We can actually start best on the left, with publishing. Of course, you may identify other areas of major concern and you should think how this workflow fits your situation, but I hope that this particular one catches the majority of cases. What we see above is the hermeneutic circle of the academic workflow. Starting out: doing your thing, digitally For fields like ours, the first and second level are much more beneficial. This third level may sound attractive but it’s not something you can simply arrive it in most instances. ![]() It’s still humanities, on some level, but done through data. No longer are you so much concerned with digitized surrogates of historical evidence, but with things that are truly (or born) digital, like plain text or metadata. SCRIVENER VS NISUS WRITER PRO SOFTWAREThe last level is superior in its technological complexity: you write your own software and mold and change the input as you see fit. This level I would properly call Digital Humanities. The second is a fairly vast landscape of intermediate DH, typified by the use of specific pieces of software and along with them a fair chunk of time that solely goes into getting the software to output a meaningful result. It is the humanities, but done digitally. The first is really basic and simple: just doing your regular old research but with the help of a computer here and there, instead of pen and paper. So today I wish to introduce three distinct levels of digital humanities. What I mean to say is that we should not let the more fancy, more advanced type of digital humanities dictate what we think DH is or can mean for us. All too often I see people struggle with a barrier to entry that is too high. I wish to sketch out a general framework that should make it easier to understand how you can start with using digital methods and data-driven analysis.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |